SEC. 1.128. ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTION OF VOLUNTARY EXPENDITURE CEILINGS.

§ 1.128

ControversialCould be simpler
In plain language

Candidates for certain San Francisco elected offices (Assessor, City Attorney, District Attorney, Public Defender, Sheriff, Treasurer, and school/community college board members) may voluntarily accept spending limits by filing a statement with the Ethics Commission by the nomination deadline; candidates for Supervisor or Mayor cannot accept such limits. Candidates who accept a ceiling and then spend beyond it face penalties unless the Ethics Commission has lifted the ceiling.

Some candidates in San Francisco can choose to limit how much money they spend on their campaigns. To do this, they file a form with the Ethics Commission before the deadline for getting on the ballot. Once they file that form, they cannot change their mind. If they break their spending promise and spend more than the limit they accepted, they can be punished. However, if the Ethics Commission decides to cancel the spending limit for everyone in that race, then the spending limit no longer applies.

  • Controversial:Voluntary spending limits in political campaigns are a subject of ongoing public debate regarding their effectiveness and fairness in elections.
  • Could be simpler:The section could be clearer by explicitly stating what the penalty amounts are rather than cross-referencing Section 1.170, which would help readers understand the actual consequences of violations.

AI-generated · claude-haiku-4-5 · informational only, not legal advice.

Official text

(Added by Ord. 71-00, File No. 000358, App. 4/28/2000; amended by Proposition O, 11/7/2000; Ord. 141-03, File No. 030034, App. 6/27/2003; Ord. 293-04, File No. 041396, App. 12/24/2004; Ord. 3-06, File No. 051439, App. 1/20/2006; Ord. 228-06, File No. 060501, App. 9/14/2006; Ord. 234-09, File. No. 090989, App. 11/20/2009)

View official source