SEC. 8A.107. MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION QUALITY REVIEW.

§ 8A.107

ComplexControversial
In plain language

The City's transportation agency must hire an independent consulting firm every two years to review whether it is meeting its operational goals and performance standards, with the results presented to the Citizens' Advisory Council, Board of Supervisors, and Mayor, followed by public hearings.

Every two years, San Francisco's transportation agency must pay a well-known consulting company to check whether the agency is doing its job well. The company looks at whether the agency has met its performance goals and makes suggestions for improvement. The consulting firm must then present its findings to the Citizens' Advisory Council, the Board of Supervisors, and the Mayor, and each of these groups must hold at least one public hearing to discuss the results.

  • Complex:The section cross-references other sections (8A.103 and Section 4 of an unspecified measure) that are necessary to understand what performance standards are being evaluated.
  • Controversial:Independent oversight and performance review of a public agency can be contentious; reasonable people may disagree about the adequacy of review frequency, who conducts it, and what standards should apply.

AI-generated · claude-haiku-4-5 · informational only, not legal advice.

Official text

(Added November 1999)

View official source