SEC. 16.132. AFFORDABLE HOUSING OPPORTUNITY FUND FOR SENIORS, FAMILIES, AND PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES.

§ 16.132

ComplexComplexControversial
In plain language

This section establishes a dedicated Affordable Housing Opportunity Fund administered by MOHCD to provide project-based rent subsidies for extremely low-income seniors, families, and people with disabilities in permanently affordable housing. The Fund receives annual appropriations starting at $8.25 million in Fiscal Year 2026-2027, with indexed increases thereafter, and expires December 31, 2046 unless extended.

San Francisco is setting up a special fund to help pay rent for very poor seniors, families, and people with disabilities. The mayor's housing office will run the fund and give money to affordable housing projects to reduce rent costs for people earning up to 15–35% of the area's median income (depending on the group). The city will put in at least $8.25 million per year starting in 2026–2027, with adjustments for revenue changes, though it can reduce that amount during major budget shortfalls. The money can help both brand-new affordable housing and existing buildings being converted to affordability, but at least 80% must go to new projects. The fund automatically ends on December 31, 2046 unless voters renew it.

  • Complex:The rent-affordability calculations in subsection (e) are layered (e.g., 'rent restricted at 30% of 60% of Median Income' with household payment at 'not to exceed 30% of 15% of Median Income') and require cross-referencing multiple income definitions, making the operative rent levels hard to parse without detailed calculations.
  • Complex:Subsection (d)(2)–(d)(3) contains intricate conditions for annual appropriation adjustments tied to discretionary revenue calculations and deficit thresholds, with multiple carve-outs and year-specific minimums that create overlapping rules.
  • Controversial:The Fund prioritizes extremely low-income households and limits use to 20% for existing housing, which reflects a policy choice about where scarce subsidy resources go; reasonable people may disagree on the income thresholds, priority populations, and balance between new development and preservation.

AI-generated · claude-haiku-4-5 · informational only, not legal advice.

Official text

(Added by Proposition G, Approved 11/5/2024)

View official source