SEC. 16.128-6. PLANNING CYCLE.

§ 16.128-6

ComplexControversial
In plain language

San Francisco implements a four-year planning cycle for allocating Dignity Fund contributions, beginning with a Community Needs Assessment, followed by a Services and Allocation Plan, and then competitive contractor selection and service delivery.

Every four years, the city follows a structured process to decide how to spend money from the Dignity Fund for seniors and adults with disabilities. Year 1 involves gathering information about what services seniors and people with disabilities actually need through surveys, focus groups, and community input. Year 2 requires creating a detailed plan that lists which services will be funded, how much money each will get, and ensures equity in services across different neighborhoods. Years 3 and 4 involve running a competitive process to select organizations to provide those services, with contracts starting in July. Throughout the process, the city must involve the public, community groups, and various city departments in planning and decision-making.

  • Complex:The section is lengthy and contains multiple nested requirements, timelines, and cross-references (e.g., to Sections 16.128-3, 16.128-4, 16.128-7, 16.128-11, and Charter Section 16.108) that make it difficult to follow for a lay reader.
  • Controversial:The allocation requirements—including minimum percentages for neighborhood-initiated projects (3%), pilot programs (3%), and contingency reserves (2%)—reflect policy choices about how to distribute public funds that reasonable people may disagree about.

AI-generated · claude-haiku-4-5 · informational only, not legal advice.

Official text

(Added by Proposition I, Approved 11/8/2016; Amended by Proposition B, Approved 11/5/2019)

View official source