SEC. 13.102. INSTANT RUNOFF ELECTIONS.

§ 13.102

ComplexControversial
In plain language

San Francisco uses ranked-choice (instant runoff) voting to elect the Mayor, Sheriff, District Attorney, City Attorney, Treasurer, Assessor-Recorder, Public Defender, and Board of Supervisors. Voters rank candidates in order of preference; if no candidate wins a majority of first-choice votes, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated and those votes redistributed to voters' next choices, repeating until someone has a majority.

Instead of voting for just one candidate, voters rank their choices in order of preference. If someone gets more than half the votes on the first count, they win. If not, the person with the fewest votes gets eliminated, and their votes go to each voter's second choice. This process repeats—eliminating the lowest candidate and moving their votes—until someone reaches a majority. If a voter ranks multiple candidates equally or runs out of choices, that ballot stops counting. The city must make sure its voting machines can handle this system.

  • Complex:Subsections (c) through (e) contain overlapping and somewhat repetitive logic about candidate elimination and vote transfer that could be streamlined for clarity.
  • Controversial:Ranked-choice voting is a subject of genuine public debate in San Francisco and elsewhere regarding fairness, voter understanding, and election outcomes.

AI-generated · claude-haiku-4-5 · informational only, not legal advice.

Official text

(Former Section 13.102 added November 1996; repealed March 2002)

View official source